Why Employee Relocation Still Matters in a Cost-Conscious World
In a world where every budget line is under the microscope, the idea of shipping household goods during a relocation is starting to feel a little... old school. With remote work booming, furnished rentals easy to find, and more professionals adopting a minimalist lifestyle, it’s fair to ask: is moving someone’s stuff across the globe still worth it?
At first glance, skipping the household goods shipment seems like an easy win, but the reality isn’t that simple. The decision to move someone’s belongings (or not) carries a lot more weight than it might seem—and can have serious consequences for the success of a relocation.
Comfort at home drives success at work
Relocation isn’t just about getting someone from Point A to Point B, it’s a major life change. When people land in a new country, the ability to settle into a space that feels like home—with their own furniture, favourite mug, and familiar items—makes a huge difference.
Research backs this up: employees who get support for household goods shipments report feeling more satisfied and less stressed. That comfort translates into quicker adaptation and stronger performance on the job. When people feel grounded at home, they show up better at work. It’s that simple.
Families move too—and their needs matter
For employees with families, bringing personal belongings isn’t a nice-to-have, it can be a deal-breaker. A spouse or child trying to adjust to a brand-new culture is already facing enough change. Familiar surroundings—like a well-loved couch or a child’s bed—can provide much-needed stability.
Let’s not forget: failed relocations are incredibly expensive. When a family can’t settle in, the assignment often ends early. According to EY, the price tag for one failed global move can top $400,000 once you factor in lost productivity and rehiring.
Cutting costs can backfire
Sure, cutting back on shipping household goods looks good on paper. But in practice? It often leads to extra spending in other areas—longer stays in temporary housing, more per diems, and requests to return home early.
There’s also a deeper issue at play. When companies strip away meaningful support during a move, employees notice. According to Mercer, how much support someone feels during relocation can directly impact whether they stay with the company in the long run.
One policy doesn’t fit all
Yes, some employees travel light. But not everyone wants to live out of a suitcase or rely on furnished rentals. Senior executives, long-haul assignees, and people moving to countries with fewer rental options often need to bring more with them.
The best mobility programs don’t force a one-size-fits-all solution. Instead, they offer flexible options—including household goods shipments—for the people and situations that call for it.
More than a service—it’s a message
Moving someone’s personal belongings isn’t just about logistics. It sends a clear message: “We see you. We value you. We want you to succeed.” That kind of signal matters—especially when you’re trying to attract and keep top talent.
Rather than eliminate household goods shipments altogether, smart organisations are approaching them strategically. That means choosing the right vendors, helping employees make informed decisions, and tailoring services to the assignment—not just the budget.
The bottom line: move what matters
So, do we still need to move household effects? If your goal is to support employees, retain talent, and set people up for success—not just ship them off—then yes, we do.
In today’s competitive landscape, global mobility isn’t about doing less. It’s about doing what works—and doing it smarter.
Want to reimagine your household goods strategy without sacrificing support? Global mobility isn’t about doing less—it’s about doing well. Let’s start the conversation…